Broadwater vs Werribee
Property investment comparison - Broadwater, VIC 3301 vs Werribee, VIC 3030
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broadwater wins 1, Werribee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Broadwater | Werribee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $675K | $675K |
| Median unit price | - | $475K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.75% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.45% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.4% | 2.4% |
| Population | 75 | 50,027 |
Broadwater vs Werribee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $675K in Broadwater and $675K in Werribee.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.75% in Broadwater and 3.70% in Werribee, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Werribee and 14.4% in Broadwater, so landlords in Werribee face less competition for tenants.
Werribee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 50,027 against 75, roughly 667 times the size of Broadwater; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Werribee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison