Skip to main content

Broke vs Freemans Reach

Property investment comparison - Broke, NSW 2330 vs Freemans Reach, NSW 2756

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broke wins 4, Freemans Reach wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrokeFreemans Reach
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$440K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)5.77%4.44%
1-year house growth+22.8%estimate+11.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.2%4.8%
Population5572,049

Broke vs Freemans Reach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Broke and $1.2M in Freemans Reach.

For units, Broke sits at a median of $440K against $760K in Freemans Reach, which makes Broke the more affordable unit market and Freemans Reach the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.8% in Broke (an estimate) and +11.1% in Freemans Reach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Broke, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 4.2% in Broke and 4.8% in Freemans Reach, so landlords in Broke face less competition for tenants.

Freemans Reach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,049 against 557, roughly 3.7 times the size of Broke; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Broke for recent price momentum, Broke for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison