Broke vs Wilton
Property investment comparison - Broke, NSW 2330 vs Wilton, NSW 2571
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broke wins 4, Wilton wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Broke | Wilton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $440K | $675K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.77% | 1.96% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.8%estimate | +22.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +22.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Population | 557 | 3,767 |
Broke vs Wilton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Broke and $1.2M in Wilton.
For units, Broke sits at a median of $440K against $675K in Wilton, which makes Broke the more affordable unit market and Wilton the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +22.8% in Broke (an estimate) and +22.0% in Wilton, so recent momentum favours Broke, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 4.2% in Broke and 5.1% in Wilton, so landlords in Broke face less competition for tenants.
Wilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,767 against 557, roughly 7 times the size of Broke; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Broke for recent price momentum, Broke for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison