Skip to main content

Brookdale vs Stratton

Property investment comparison - Brookdale, WA 6112 vs Stratton, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brookdale wins 1, Stratton wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrookdaleStratton
Median house price$760K$755K
Median unit price$510K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.68%4.84%
Gross rental yield (units)6.48%7.29%
1-year house growth-+19.9%
3-year house growth+102.9%+84.8%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.3%
Population2,9683,267

Brookdale vs Stratton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $760K in Brookdale and $755K in Stratton, so Stratton is the cheaper entry point, with Brookdale houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Stratton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.84%, compared with 4.68% in Brookdale, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Brookdale houses are +102.9% and Stratton houses +84.8%, so Brookdale has compounded faster than Stratton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Stratton and 2.2% in Brookdale, so landlords in Stratton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Stratton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,267 against 2,968, larger than Brookdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stratton for rental income, Stratton for a lower purchase price, Stratton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison