Skip to main content

Broughton Village vs Darlinghurst

Property investment comparison - Broughton Village, NSW 2534 vs Darlinghurst, NSW 2010

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broughton Village wins 2, Darlinghurst wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBroughton VillageDarlinghurst
Median house price$2.9M$2.9M
Median unit price$945K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.56%2.42%
Gross rental yield (units)3.37%-
1-year house growth-+5.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population9510,615

Broughton Village vs Darlinghurst: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.9M in Broughton Village and $2.9M in Darlinghurst, so Broughton Village is the cheaper entry point, with Darlinghurst houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Broughton Village sits at a median of $945K against $1.0M in Darlinghurst, which makes Broughton Village the more affordable unit market and Darlinghurst the pricier one.

On cash flow, Darlinghurst leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.42%, compared with 1.56% in Broughton Village, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Darlinghurst and 1.9% in Broughton Village, so landlords in Darlinghurst face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Darlinghurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,615 against 95, roughly 112 times the size of Broughton Village; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Darlinghurst for rental income, Broughton Village for a lower purchase price, Darlinghurst for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison