Skip to main content

Broughton Village vs Lilli Pilli

Property investment comparison - Broughton Village, NSW 2534 vs Lilli Pilli, NSW 2229

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broughton Village wins 2, Lilli Pilli wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBroughton VillageLilli Pilli
Median house price$2.9M$2.9M
Median unit price$945K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.56%3.03%
Gross rental yield (units)3.37%1.67%
1-year house growth--6.3%
3-year house growth-+6.4%
Vacancy rate1.9%12.5%
Population951,405

Broughton Village vs Lilli Pilli: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.9M in Broughton Village and $2.9M in Lilli Pilli.

On cash flow, Lilli Pilli leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.03%, compared with 1.56% in Broughton Village, a gap of 1.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Broughton Village and 12.5% in Lilli Pilli, so landlords in Broughton Village face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lilli Pilli is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,405 against 95, roughly 15 times the size of Broughton Village; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lilli Pilli for rental income, Broughton Village for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison