Brucknell vs Williams Landing
Property investment comparison - Brucknell, VIC 3268 vs Williams Landing, VIC 3027
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brucknell wins 0, Williams Landing wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Brucknell | Williams Landing |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $880K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.60% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Population | 127 | 9,448 |
Brucknell vs Williams Landing: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Brucknell and $880K in Williams Landing.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Williams Landing and 2.6% in Brucknell, so landlords in Williams Landing face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Williams Landing is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,448 against 127, roughly 74 times the size of Brucknell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Williams Landing for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Williams Landing, VIC 3027
Open Williams Landing suburb profileRecent sales in Williams Landing
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison