Skip to main content

Brunkerville vs Glebe

Property investment comparison - Brunkerville, NSW 2323 vs Glebe, NSW 2037

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunkerville wins 2, Glebe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunkervilleGlebe
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$535K$1M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.32%2.31%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%-
1-year house growth--0.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.1%
Population21611,680

Brunkerville vs Glebe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Brunkerville and $2.6M in Glebe, so Glebe is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Brunkerville sits at a median of $535K against $1M in Glebe, which makes Brunkerville the more affordable unit market and Glebe the pricier one.

On cash flow, Glebe leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.31%, compared with 1.32% in Brunkerville, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunkerville and 1.1% in Glebe, so landlords in Brunkerville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glebe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,680 against 216, roughly 54 times the size of Brunkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glebe for rental income, Glebe for a lower purchase price, Brunkerville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison