Skip to main content

Brunkerville vs Monterey

Property investment comparison - Brunkerville, NSW 2323 vs Monterey, NSW 2217

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunkerville wins 3, Monterey wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunkervilleMonterey
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$535K$930K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.32%2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%3.88%
1-year house growth-+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.6%
Population2164,619

Brunkerville vs Monterey: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Brunkerville and $2.6M in Monterey, so Monterey is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Brunkerville sits at a median of $535K against $930K in Monterey, which makes Brunkerville the more affordable unit market and Monterey the pricier one.

On cash flow, Monterey leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.40%, compared with 1.32% in Brunkerville, a gap of 1.08 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunkerville and 1.6% in Monterey, so landlords in Brunkerville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Monterey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,619 against 216, roughly 21 times the size of Brunkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Monterey for rental income, Monterey for a lower purchase price, Brunkerville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison