Skip to main content

Brunkerville vs Woolooware

Property investment comparison - Brunkerville, NSW 2323 vs Woolooware, NSW 2230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunkerville wins 3, Woolooware wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunkervilleWoolooware
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$535K$995K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.32%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%3.92%
1-year house growth-+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%2.4%
Population2165,060

Brunkerville vs Woolooware: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Brunkerville and $2.6M in Woolooware, so Woolooware is the cheaper entry point, with Brunkerville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Brunkerville sits at a median of $535K against $995K in Woolooware, which makes Brunkerville the more affordable unit market and Woolooware the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woolooware leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 1.32% in Brunkerville, a gap of 1.78 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunkerville and 2.4% in Woolooware, so landlords in Brunkerville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woolooware is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,060 against 216, roughly 23 times the size of Brunkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolooware for rental income, Woolooware for a lower purchase price, Brunkerville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison