Skip to main content

Brunswick East vs Oakleigh

Property investment comparison - Brunswick East, VIC 3057 vs Oakleigh, VIC 3166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunswick East wins 5, Oakleigh wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunswick EastOakleigh
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$535K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%5.65%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.4%
Population13,2798,442

Brunswick East vs Oakleigh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Brunswick East and $1.4M in Oakleigh, so Brunswick East is the cheaper entry point, with Oakleigh houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Brunswick East sits at a median of $535K against $585K in Oakleigh, which makes Brunswick East the more affordable unit market and Oakleigh the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Brunswick East (an estimate) and -0.9% in Oakleigh (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Brunswick East, while Oakleigh went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Brunswick East and 1.4% in Oakleigh, so landlords in Brunswick East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,279 against 8,442, larger than Oakleigh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick East for a lower purchase price, Brunswick East for recent price momentum, Brunswick East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison