Skip to main content

Brunswick vs Moorabbin

Property investment comparison - Brunswick, VIC 3056 vs Moorabbin, VIC 3189

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunswick wins 3, Moorabbin wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunswickMoorabbin
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$600K$765K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.36%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)5.19%4.42%
1-year house growth+0.1%estimate+6.1%
3-year house growth--0.8%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.0%
Population24,8966,287

Brunswick vs Moorabbin: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Brunswick and $1.3M in Moorabbin.

For units, Brunswick sits at a median of $600K against $765K in Moorabbin, which makes Brunswick the more affordable unit market and Moorabbin the pricier one.

On cash flow, Brunswick leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.36%, compared with 3.20% in Moorabbin, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.1% in Brunswick (an estimate) and +6.1% in Moorabbin, so recent momentum favours Moorabbin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.0%.

Brunswick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,896 against 6,287, roughly 4.0 times the size of Moorabbin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick for rental income, Moorabbin for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison