Skip to main content

Brunswick vs Mount Moriac

Property investment comparison - Brunswick, VIC 3056 vs Mount Moriac, VIC 3240

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunswick wins 3, Mount Moriac wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunswickMount Moriac
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$600K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.36%2.83%
Gross rental yield (units)5.19%7.14%
1-year house growth+0.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%6.3%
Population24,896251

Brunswick vs Mount Moriac: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Brunswick and $1.3M in Mount Moriac, so Brunswick is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Moriac houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Brunswick sits at a median of $600K against $425K in Mount Moriac, which makes Mount Moriac the more affordable unit market and Brunswick the pricier one.

On cash flow, Brunswick leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.36%, compared with 2.83% in Mount Moriac, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Brunswick and 6.3% in Mount Moriac, so landlords in Brunswick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,896 against 251, roughly 99 times the size of Mount Moriac; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick for rental income, Brunswick for a lower purchase price, Brunswick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison