Skip to main content

Bucca vs Dunmore

Property investment comparison - Bucca, NSW 2450 vs Dunmore, NSW 2529

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bucca wins 4, Dunmore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuccaDunmore
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$570K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.33%5.44%
1-year house growth+10.5%+10.0%
3-year house growth+16.0%+3.2%
Vacancy rate1.9%5.3%
Population614318

Bucca vs Dunmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bucca and $1.1M in Dunmore, so Dunmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bucca sits at a median of $570K against $755K in Dunmore, which makes Bucca the more affordable unit market and Dunmore the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.5% in Bucca and +10.0% in Dunmore, so recent momentum favours Bucca, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bucca houses are +16.0% and Dunmore houses +3.2%, so Bucca has compounded faster than Dunmore over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Bucca and 5.3% in Dunmore, so landlords in Bucca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bucca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 614 against 318, larger than Dunmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dunmore for a lower purchase price, Bucca for recent price momentum, Bucca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison