Skip to main content

Buckley vs Caulfield East

Property investment comparison - Buckley, VIC 3240 vs Caulfield East, VIC 3145

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buckley wins 0, Caulfield East wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuckleyCaulfield East
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price-$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.07%2.83%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.11%
1-year house growth-+0.4%
3-year house growth-+10.2%
Vacancy rate6.2%1.0%
Population2281,293

Buckley vs Caulfield East: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Buckley and $1.6M in Caulfield East, so Caulfield East is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Caulfield East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.83%, compared with 2.07% in Buckley, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Caulfield East and 6.2% in Buckley, so landlords in Caulfield East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Caulfield East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,293 against 228, roughly 6 times the size of Buckley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Caulfield East for rental income, Caulfield East for a lower purchase price, Caulfield East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison