Buckley vs Donvale
Property investment comparison - Buckley, VIC 3240 vs Donvale, VIC 3111
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buckley wins 0, Donvale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Buckley | Donvale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | - | $850K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.07% | 2.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.11% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +8.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.2% | 1.6% |
| Population | 228 | 12,644 |
Buckley vs Donvale: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Buckley and $1.6M in Donvale.
On cash flow, Donvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.67%, compared with 2.07% in Buckley, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Donvale and 6.2% in Buckley, so landlords in Donvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Donvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,644 against 228, roughly 55 times the size of Buckley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Donvale for rental income, Donvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison