Bulgarra vs Coodanup
Property investment comparison - Bulgarra, WA 6714 vs Coodanup, WA 6210
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bulgarra wins 4, Coodanup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bulgarra | Coodanup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $350K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 9.35% | 4.51% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 11.37% | 5.38% |
| 1-year house growth | +21.4%estimate | +16.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +76.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Population | 2,990 | 4,366 |
Bulgarra vs Coodanup: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Bulgarra and $700K in Coodanup.
On cash flow, Bulgarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 9.35%, compared with 4.51% in Coodanup, a gap of 4.84 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +21.4% in Bulgarra (an estimate) and +16.7% in Coodanup, so recent momentum favours Bulgarra, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bulgarra and 1.4% in Coodanup, so landlords in Bulgarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Coodanup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,366 against 2,990, larger than Bulgarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bulgarra for rental income, Bulgarra for recent price momentum, Bulgarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison