Skip to main content

Bulgarra vs Webberton

Property investment comparison - Bulgarra, WA 6714 vs Webberton, WA 6530

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bulgarra wins 5, Webberton wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBulgarraWebberton
Median house price$700K$705K
Median unit price$350K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)9.35%4.31%
Gross rental yield (units)11.37%4.58%
1-year house growth+21.4%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%1.0%
Population2,990158

Bulgarra vs Webberton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $700K in Bulgarra and $705K in Webberton, so Bulgarra is the cheaper entry point, with Webberton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bulgarra sits at a median of $350K against $465K in Webberton, which makes Bulgarra the more affordable unit market and Webberton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bulgarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 9.35%, compared with 4.31% in Webberton, a gap of 5.04 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bulgarra and 1.0% in Webberton, so landlords in Bulgarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bulgarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,990 against 158, roughly 19 times the size of Webberton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bulgarra for rental income, Bulgarra for a lower purchase price, Bulgarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison