Skip to main content

Bullarook vs Croydon North

Property investment comparison - Bullarook, VIC 3352 vs Croydon North, VIC 3136

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bullarook wins 0, Croydon North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBullarookCroydon North
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.91%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.50%
1-year house growth-+0.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.6%
Population778,092

Bullarook vs Croydon North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bullarook and $1.1M in Croydon North, so Croydon North is the cheaper entry point, with Bullarook houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Croydon North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 1.91% in Bullarook, a gap of 1.66 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Croydon North and 1.6% in Bullarook, so landlords in Croydon North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Croydon North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,092 against 77, roughly 105 times the size of Bullarook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Croydon North for rental income, Croydon North for a lower purchase price, Croydon North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison