Bullarook vs Kingsville
Property investment comparison - Bullarook, VIC 3352 vs Kingsville, VIC 3012
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bullarook wins 1, Kingsville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bullarook | Kingsville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.91% | 3.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.05% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -3.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 77 | 3,920 |
Bullarook vs Kingsville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Bullarook and $1.1M in Kingsville, so Bullarook is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsville houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kingsville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 1.91% in Bullarook, a gap of 1.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Kingsville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,920 against 77, roughly 51 times the size of Bullarook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kingsville for rental income, Bullarook for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison