Skip to main content

Bundaberg West vs Gulliver

Property investment comparison - Bundaberg West, QLD 4670 vs Gulliver, QLD 4812

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundaberg West wins 1, Gulliver wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundaberg WestGulliver
Median house price$630K$630K
Median unit price$485K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+17.7%+20.8%
3-year house growth+67.5%+90.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.6%
Population2,5962,884

Bundaberg West vs Gulliver: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Bundaberg West and $630K in Gulliver.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Bundaberg West and +20.8% in Gulliver, so recent momentum favours Gulliver, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bundaberg West houses are +67.5% and Gulliver houses +90.6%, so Gulliver has compounded faster than Bundaberg West over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bundaberg West and 1.6% in Gulliver, so landlords in Bundaberg West face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gulliver is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,884 against 2,596, larger than Bundaberg West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gulliver for recent price momentum, Bundaberg West for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison