Skip to main content

Bungarribee vs Edensor Park

Property investment comparison - Bungarribee, NSW 2767 vs Edensor Park, NSW 2176

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungarribee wins 4, Edensor Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBungarribeeEdensor Park
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$815K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.13%-
1-year house growth+6.8%+4.0%estimate
3-year house growth+19.1%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.5%
Population3,17710,279

Bungarribee vs Edensor Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Bungarribee and $1.5M in Edensor Park, so Bungarribee is the cheaper entry point, with Edensor Park houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Bungarribee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.17%, compared with 2.52% in Edensor Park, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Bungarribee and +4.0% in Edensor Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bungarribee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.

Edensor Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,279 against 3,177, roughly 3.2 times the size of Bungarribee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bungarribee for rental income, Bungarribee for a lower purchase price, Bungarribee for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison