Skip to main content

Bungarribee vs St Johns Park

Property investment comparison - Bungarribee, NSW 2767 vs St Johns Park, NSW 2176

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungarribee wins 4, St Johns Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBungarribeeSt Johns Park
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$815K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%2.61%
Gross rental yield (units)4.13%3.81%
1-year house growth+6.8%+13.1%estimate
3-year house growth+19.1%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.8%
Population3,1776,302

Bungarribee vs St Johns Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Bungarribee and $1.5M in St Johns Park, so Bungarribee is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Bungarribee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.17%, compared with 2.61% in St Johns Park, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Bungarribee and +13.1% in St Johns Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours St Johns Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Bungarribee and 1.8% in St Johns Park, so landlords in Bungarribee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Johns Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,302 against 3,177, larger than Bungarribee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bungarribee for rental income, Bungarribee for a lower purchase price, St Johns Park for recent price momentum, Bungarribee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison