Skip to main content

Buninyong vs Nichols Point

Property investment comparison - Buninyong, VIC 3357 vs Nichols Point, VIC 3501

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buninyong wins 2, Nichols Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuninyongNichols Point
Median house price$770K$765K
Median unit price-$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.27%3.01%
Gross rental yield (units)4.07%6.26%
1-year house growth+5.4%+6.0%estimate
3-year house growth+11.8%-
Vacancy rate0.6%3.6%
Population3,7971,723

Buninyong vs Nichols Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $770K in Buninyong and $765K in Nichols Point, so Nichols Point is the cheaper entry point, with Buninyong houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Buninyong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 3.01% in Nichols Point, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.4% in Buninyong and +6.0% in Nichols Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nichols Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Buninyong and 3.6% in Nichols Point, so landlords in Buninyong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Buninyong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,797 against 1,723, roughly 2.2 times the size of Nichols Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buninyong for rental income, Nichols Point for a lower purchase price, Nichols Point for recent price momentum, Buninyong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison