Skip to main content

Burdell vs Gatton

Property investment comparison - Burdell, QLD 4818 vs Gatton, QLD 4343

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burdell wins 2, Gatton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurdellGatton
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price-$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.64%4.17%
Gross rental yield (units)4.55%4.51%
1-year house growth+15.4%+15.8%
3-year house growth+66.9%+73.5%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.6%
Population7,1717,851

Burdell vs Gatton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Burdell and $730K in Gatton.

On cash flow, Burdell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.64%, compared with 4.17% in Gatton, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.4% in Burdell and +15.8% in Gatton, so recent momentum favours Gatton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Burdell houses are +66.9% and Gatton houses +73.5%, so Gatton has compounded faster than Burdell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Gatton and 1.3% in Burdell, so landlords in Gatton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gatton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,851 against 7,171, larger than Burdell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burdell for rental income, Gatton for recent price momentum, Gatton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison