Skip to main content

Burpengary East vs Riverhills

Property investment comparison - Burpengary East, QLD 4505 vs Riverhills, QLD 4074

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burpengary East wins 1, Riverhills wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurpengary EastRiverhills
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$610K$795K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%3.31%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.05%
1-year house growth+22.9%estimate-
3-year house growth-+51.2%
Vacancy rate2.2%0.9%
Population9,6544,121

Burpengary East vs Riverhills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Burpengary East and $1.2M in Riverhills, so Riverhills is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Burpengary East sits at a median of $610K against $795K in Riverhills, which makes Burpengary East the more affordable unit market and Riverhills the pricier one.

On cash flow, Riverhills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.31%, compared with 3.18% in Burpengary East, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Riverhills and 2.2% in Burpengary East, so landlords in Riverhills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burpengary East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,654 against 4,121, roughly 2.3 times the size of Riverhills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Riverhills for rental income, Riverhills for a lower purchase price, Riverhills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison