Burwood East vs Glenlyon
Property investment comparison - Burwood East, VIC 3151 vs Glenlyon, VIC 3461
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burwood East wins 1, Glenlyon wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Burwood East | Glenlyon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | $605K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.87% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.66% |
| 1-year house growth | +0.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +5.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 7.5% |
| Population | 10,675 | 431 |
Burwood East vs Glenlyon: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Burwood East and $1.3M in Glenlyon.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Burwood East and 7.5% in Glenlyon, so landlords in Burwood East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Burwood East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,675 against 431, roughly 25 times the size of Glenlyon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Burwood East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison