Skip to main content

Burwood East vs Seaholme

Property investment comparison - Burwood East, VIC 3151 vs Seaholme, VIC 3018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burwood East wins 3, Seaholme wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurwood EastSeaholme
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%2.63%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.92%
1-year house growth+0.0%+2.2%estimate
3-year house growth+5.4%-
Vacancy rate1.7%1.9%
Population10,6752,067

Burwood East vs Seaholme: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Burwood East and $1.3M in Seaholme, so Burwood East is the cheaper entry point, with Seaholme houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Burwood East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.87%, compared with 2.63% in Seaholme, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.0% in Burwood East and +2.2% in Seaholme (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Seaholme, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Burwood East and 1.9% in Seaholme, so landlords in Burwood East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burwood East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,675 against 2,067, roughly 5 times the size of Seaholme; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burwood East for rental income, Burwood East for a lower purchase price, Seaholme for recent price momentum, Burwood East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison