Skip to main content

Buttaba vs Colo Vale

Property investment comparison - Buttaba, NSW 2283 vs Colo Vale, NSW 2575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buttaba wins 4, Colo Vale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricButtabaColo Vale
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$600K$680K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.53%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.69%4.03%
1-year house growth+12.4%estimate+2.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%3.1%
Population1,2041,775

Buttaba vs Colo Vale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Buttaba and $980K in Colo Vale.

For units, Buttaba sits at a median of $600K against $680K in Colo Vale, which makes Buttaba the more affordable unit market and Colo Vale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Colo Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.53% in Buttaba, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.4% in Buttaba (an estimate) and +2.7% in Colo Vale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Buttaba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Buttaba and 3.1% in Colo Vale, so landlords in Buttaba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Colo Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,775 against 1,204, larger than Buttaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Colo Vale for rental income, Buttaba for recent price momentum, Buttaba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison