Buxton vs Woorinen
Property investment comparison - Buxton, VIC 3711 vs Woorinen, VIC 3589
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buxton wins 1, Woorinen wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Buxton | Woorinen |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $675K | $675K |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.91% | 3.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -5.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Population | 591 | 262 |
Buxton vs Woorinen: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $675K in Buxton and $675K in Woorinen.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.91% in Buxton and 3.89% in Woorinen, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Woorinen and 4.0% in Buxton, so landlords in Woorinen face less competition for tenants.
Buxton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 591 against 262, roughly 2.3 times the size of Woorinen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Woorinen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison