Skip to main content

Byabarra vs Singleton Heights

Property investment comparison - Byabarra, NSW 2446 vs Singleton Heights, NSW 2330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Byabarra wins 1, Singleton Heights wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricByabarraSingleton Heights
Median house price$755K$760K
Median unit price$510K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.63%4.77%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%5.68%
1-year house growth-+9.3%
3-year house growth-+24.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population3294,896

Byabarra vs Singleton Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $755K in Byabarra and $760K in Singleton Heights, so Byabarra is the cheaper entry point, with Singleton Heights houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Byabarra sits at a median of $510K against $460K in Singleton Heights, which makes Singleton Heights the more affordable unit market and Byabarra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Singleton Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.77%, compared with 4.63% in Byabarra, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Singleton Heights and 1.6% in Byabarra, so landlords in Singleton Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Singleton Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,896 against 329, roughly 15 times the size of Byabarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Singleton Heights for rental income, Byabarra for a lower purchase price, Singleton Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison