Skip to main content

Byaduk North vs Charlemont

Property investment comparison - Byaduk North, VIC 3300 vs Charlemont, VIC 3217

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Byaduk North wins 4, Charlemont wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricByaduk NorthCharlemont
Median house price$640K$645K
Median unit price$310K$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.34%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.56%2.67%
1-year house growth-+2.5%
3-year house growth-+4.9%
Vacancy rate0.3%2.4%
Population1342,612

Byaduk North vs Charlemont: what the numbers say

The median house price is $640K in Byaduk North and $645K in Charlemont, so Byaduk North is the cheaper entry point, with Charlemont houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Byaduk North sits at a median of $310K against $475K in Charlemont, which makes Byaduk North the more affordable unit market and Charlemont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.34% in Byaduk North, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Byaduk North and 2.4% in Charlemont, so landlords in Byaduk North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 134, roughly 19 times the size of Byaduk North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charlemont for rental income, Byaduk North for a lower purchase price, Byaduk North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison