Bywong vs Narwee
Property investment comparison - Bywong, NSW 2621 vs Narwee, NSW 2209
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bywong wins 3, Narwee wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bywong | Narwee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | $635K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.73% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 4.60% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.1% | +2.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +28.4% | +19.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.7% |
| Population | 1,342 | 5,411 |
Bywong vs Narwee: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.7M in Bywong and $1.6M in Narwee, so Narwee is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Bywong and +2.8% in Narwee, so recent momentum favours Bywong, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Bywong houses are +28.4% and Narwee houses +19.7%, so Bywong has compounded faster than Narwee over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Narwee and 1.3% in Bywong, so landlords in Narwee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narwee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,411 against 1,342, roughly 4.0 times the size of Bywong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narwee for a lower purchase price, Bywong for recent price momentum, Narwee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison