Skip to main content

Bywong vs Silverwater

Property investment comparison - Bywong, NSW 2621 vs Silverwater, NSW 2128

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bywong wins 4, Silverwater wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBywongSilverwater
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$635K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.61%4.80%
1-year house growth+5.1%+1.4%
3-year house growth+28.4%+4.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.5%
Population1,3423,600

Bywong vs Silverwater: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Bywong and $1.7M in Silverwater, so Bywong is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bywong sits at a median of $635K against $710K in Silverwater, which makes Bywong the more affordable unit market and Silverwater the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Bywong and +1.4% in Silverwater, so recent momentum favours Bywong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bywong houses are +28.4% and Silverwater houses +4.1%, so Bywong has compounded faster than Silverwater over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Silverwater and 1.3% in Bywong, so landlords in Silverwater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Silverwater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,600 against 1,342, roughly 2.7 times the size of Bywong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bywong for a lower purchase price, Bywong for recent price momentum, Silverwater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison