Skip to main content

Cabbage Tree Creek vs Hamilton

Property investment comparison - Cabbage Tree Creek, VIC 3889 vs Hamilton, VIC 3300

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cabbage Tree Creek wins 1, Hamilton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCabbage Tree CreekHamilton
Median house price$435K$440K
Median unit price-$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.52%4.76%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.53%
1-year house growth-+10.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%0.3%
Population5210,346

Cabbage Tree Creek vs Hamilton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $435K in Cabbage Tree Creek and $440K in Hamilton, so Cabbage Tree Creek is the cheaper entry point, with Hamilton houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Hamilton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.76%, compared with 4.52% in Cabbage Tree Creek, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 0.9% in Cabbage Tree Creek, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 52, roughly 199 times the size of Cabbage Tree Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton for rental income, Cabbage Tree Creek for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison