Skip to main content

Cabramatta vs Gledswood Hills

Property investment comparison - Cabramatta, NSW 2166 vs Gledswood Hills, NSW 2557

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cabramatta wins 4, Gledswood Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCabramattaGledswood Hills
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$505K$1.9M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.09%
Gross rental yield (units)4.99%1.98%
1-year house growth+2.1%+11.2%estimate
3-year house growth+23.4%-
Vacancy rate1.1%2.2%
Population21,1426,112

Cabramatta vs Gledswood Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Cabramatta and $1.4M in Gledswood Hills, so Cabramatta is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cabramatta sits at a median of $505K against $1.9M in Gledswood Hills, which makes Cabramatta the more affordable unit market and Gledswood Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.1% in Cabramatta and +11.2% in Gledswood Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gledswood Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Cabramatta and 2.2% in Gledswood Hills, so landlords in Cabramatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cabramatta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,142 against 6,112, roughly 3.5 times the size of Gledswood Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cabramatta for a lower purchase price, Gledswood Hills for recent price momentum, Cabramatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison