Calavos vs Yandina
Property investment comparison - Calavos, QLD 4670 vs Yandina, QLD 4561
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calavos wins 0, Yandina wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Calavos | Yandina |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $745K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.05% | 3.68% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.35% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +36.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 0.5% |
| Population | 359 | 3,073 |
Calavos vs Yandina: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Calavos and $1.2M in Yandina, so Yandina is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Yandina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 2.05% in Calavos, a gap of 1.63 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Yandina and 1.5% in Calavos, so landlords in Yandina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yandina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,073 against 359, roughly 9 times the size of Calavos; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yandina for rental income, Yandina for a lower purchase price, Yandina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison