Skip to main content

Calder vs Moonah

Property investment comparison - Calder, TAS 7325 vs Moonah, TAS 7009

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calder wins 2, Moonah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalderMoonah
Median house price$705K$700K
Median unit price$440K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.43%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.02%5.36%
1-year house growth-+13.7%
3-year house growth-+9.5%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.7%
Population2315,884

Calder vs Moonah: what the numbers say

The median house price is $705K in Calder and $700K in Moonah, so Moonah is the cheaper entry point, with Calder houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Calder sits at a median of $440K against $485K in Moonah, which makes Calder the more affordable unit market and Moonah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Moonah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 3.43% in Calder, a gap of 1.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Calder and 0.7% in Moonah, so landlords in Calder face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moonah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,884 against 231, roughly 25 times the size of Calder; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moonah for rental income, Moonah for a lower purchase price, Calder for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison