Skip to main content

Calderwood vs Cambridge Park

Property investment comparison - Calderwood, NSW 2527 vs Cambridge Park, NSW 2747

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calderwood wins 4, Cambridge Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalderwoodCambridge Park
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$720K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.55%4.20%
1-year house growth+16.5%+13.5%estimate
3-year house growth+22.6%-
Vacancy rate0.1%2.4%
Population3,0137,054

Calderwood vs Cambridge Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Calderwood and $1.1M in Cambridge Park, so Cambridge Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Calderwood sits at a median of $720K against $820K in Cambridge Park, which makes Calderwood the more affordable unit market and Cambridge Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Calderwood and +13.5% in Cambridge Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Calderwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Calderwood and 2.4% in Cambridge Park, so landlords in Calderwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cambridge Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,054 against 3,013, roughly 2.3 times the size of Calderwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cambridge Park for a lower purchase price, Calderwood for recent price momentum, Calderwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison