Skip to main content

Calderwood vs Oakdale

Property investment comparison - Calderwood, NSW 2527 vs Oakdale, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calderwood wins 5, Oakdale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalderwoodOakdale
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$720K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%2.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.55%4.16%
1-year house growth+16.5%+12.6%
3-year house growth+22.6%+19.7%
Vacancy rate0.1%1.0%
Population3,0132,028

Calderwood vs Oakdale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Calderwood and $1.1M in Oakdale.

On cash flow, Calderwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 2.90% in Oakdale, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Calderwood and +12.6% in Oakdale, so recent momentum favours Calderwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Calderwood houses are +22.6% and Oakdale houses +19.7%, so Calderwood has compounded faster than Oakdale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Calderwood and 1.0% in Oakdale, so landlords in Calderwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Calderwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,013 against 2,028, larger than Oakdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Calderwood for rental income, Calderwood for recent price momentum, Calderwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison