Calderwood vs Oakhurst
Property investment comparison - Calderwood, NSW 2527 vs Oakhurst, NSW 2761
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calderwood wins 3, Oakhurst wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Calderwood | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $720K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.55% | 4.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.5% | +8.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +22.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| Population | 3,013 | 6,947 |
Calderwood vs Oakhurst: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Calderwood and $1.1M in Oakhurst.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Calderwood and +8.5% in Oakhurst (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Calderwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Calderwood and 2.7% in Oakhurst, so landlords in Calderwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Oakhurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,947 against 3,013, roughly 2.3 times the size of Calderwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Calderwood for recent price momentum, Calderwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison