Calga vs Mount Saint Thomas
Property investment comparison - Calga, NSW 2250 vs Mount Saint Thomas, NSW 2500
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calga wins 1, Mount Saint Thomas wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Calga | Mount Saint Thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $950K |
| Median unit price | $605K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +12.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.2% |
| Population | 134 | 1,449 |
Calga vs Mount Saint Thomas: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Calga and $950K in Mount Saint Thomas.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Calga and 1.2% in Mount Saint Thomas, so landlords in Calga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Saint Thomas is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,449 against 134, roughly 11 times the size of Calga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Calga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Mount Saint Thomas, NSW 2500
Open Mount Saint Thomas suburb profileRecent sales in Mount Saint Thomas
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison