Calliope vs Glen Eden
Property investment comparison - Calliope, QLD 4680 vs Glen Eden, QLD 4680
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calliope wins 1, Glen Eden wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Calliope | Glen Eden |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $655K | $655K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.68% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.00% | 5.49% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | +15.9% |
| 3-year house growth | +59.3% | +68.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Population | 5,263 | 2,918 |
Calliope vs Glen Eden: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $655K in Calliope and $655K in Glen Eden.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Calliope and +15.9% in Glen Eden, so recent momentum favours Glen Eden, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Calliope houses are +59.3% and Glen Eden houses +68.1%, so Glen Eden has compounded faster than Calliope over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.
Calliope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,263 against 2,918, larger than Glen Eden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glen Eden for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison