Skip to main content

Cambewarra Village vs Woodburn

Property investment comparison - Cambewarra Village, NSW 2540 vs Woodburn, NSW 2538

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cambewarra Village wins 3, Woodburn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCambewarra VillageWoodburn
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$630K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.26%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%2.48%
1-year house growth+2.3%-
3-year house growth+9.6%-
Vacancy rate2.3%0.6%
Population1,211817

Cambewarra Village vs Woodburn: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Cambewarra Village and $1.1M in Woodburn.

For units, Cambewarra Village sits at a median of $630K against $700K in Woodburn, which makes Cambewarra Village the more affordable unit market and Woodburn the pricier one.

On cash flow, Cambewarra Village leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.26%, compared with 2.89% in Woodburn, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Woodburn and 2.3% in Cambewarra Village, so landlords in Woodburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cambewarra Village is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,211 against 817, larger than Woodburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cambewarra Village for rental income, Woodburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison