Camden Park vs North Avoca
Property investment comparison - Camden Park, NSW 2570 vs North Avoca, NSW 2260
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Camden Park wins 0, North Avoca wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Camden Park | North Avoca |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | $720K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.83% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.9%estimate | +2.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 9.9% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,233 | 2,318 |
Camden Park vs North Avoca: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Camden Park and $1.6M in North Avoca.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.9% in Camden Park (an estimate) and +2.2% in North Avoca, so recent momentum favours North Avoca, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in North Avoca and 9.9% in Camden Park, so landlords in North Avoca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,318 against 2,233, larger than Camden Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Avoca for recent price momentum, North Avoca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison