Skip to main content

Camp Mountain vs Tallebudgera

Property investment comparison - Camp Mountain, QLD 4520 vs Tallebudgera, QLD 4228

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Camp Mountain wins 3, Tallebudgera wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCamp MountainTallebudgera
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price$720K$985K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.48%2.14%
1-year house growth+15.1%estimate+13.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate11.5%2.1%
Population1,4473,826

Camp Mountain vs Tallebudgera: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Camp Mountain and $2.2M in Tallebudgera, so Tallebudgera is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Camp Mountain sits at a median of $720K against $985K in Tallebudgera, which makes Camp Mountain the more affordable unit market and Tallebudgera the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Camp Mountain (an estimate) and +13.0% in Tallebudgera (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Camp Mountain, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Tallebudgera and 11.5% in Camp Mountain, so landlords in Tallebudgera face less competition for tenants.

Tallebudgera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,826 against 1,447, roughly 2.6 times the size of Camp Mountain; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tallebudgera for a lower purchase price, Camp Mountain for recent price momentum, Tallebudgera for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison