Skip to main content

Campbelltown vs Tascott

Property investment comparison - Campbelltown, NSW 2560 vs Tascott, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campbelltown wins 3, Tascott wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCampbelltownTascott
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$590K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%5.34%
1-year house growth+9.9%+6.2%
3-year house growth+16.9%+7.4%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.9%
Population16,5771,675

Campbelltown vs Tascott: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Campbelltown and $1.0M in Tascott.

On cash flow, Tascott leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.17% in Campbelltown, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Campbelltown and +6.2% in Tascott, so recent momentum favours Campbelltown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Campbelltown houses are +16.9% and Tascott houses +7.4%, so Campbelltown has compounded faster than Tascott over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.

Campbelltown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,577 against 1,675, roughly 10 times the size of Tascott; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tascott for rental income, Campbelltown for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison