Campsie vs Eraring
Property investment comparison - Campsie, NSW 2194 vs Eraring, NSW 2264
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campsie wins 3, Eraring wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Campsie | Eraring |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.1M | $2.1M |
| Median unit price | $690K | $580K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.12% | 1.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.59% | 5.33% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Population | 26,132 | 221 |
Campsie vs Eraring: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.1M in Campsie and $2.1M in Eraring, so Campsie is the cheaper entry point, with Eraring houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Campsie sits at a median of $690K against $580K in Eraring, which makes Eraring the more affordable unit market and Campsie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Campsie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.12%, compared with 1.79% in Eraring, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Campsie and 2.6% in Eraring, so landlords in Campsie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Campsie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,132 against 221, roughly 118 times the size of Eraring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Campsie for rental income, Campsie for a lower purchase price, Campsie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison