Skip to main content

Capalaba vs Upper Coomera

Property investment comparison - Capalaba, QLD 4157 vs Upper Coomera, QLD 4209

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Capalaba wins 4, Upper Coomera wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCapalabaUpper Coomera
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$765K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.60%
1-year house growth+15.9%+16.0%
3-year house growth+45.9%+41.9%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.3%
Population18,00227,180

Capalaba vs Upper Coomera: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Capalaba and $1.1M in Upper Coomera, so Capalaba is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Capalaba sits at a median of $765K against $840K in Upper Coomera, which makes Capalaba the more affordable unit market and Upper Coomera the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Capalaba and +16.0% in Upper Coomera, so recent momentum favours Upper Coomera, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Capalaba houses are +45.9% and Upper Coomera houses +41.9%, so Capalaba has compounded faster than Upper Coomera over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.

Upper Coomera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,180 against 18,002, larger than Capalaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Capalaba for a lower purchase price, Upper Coomera for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison