Skip to main content

Cape Hillsborough vs Kawungan

Property investment comparison - Cape Hillsborough, QLD 4740 vs Kawungan, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cape Hillsborough wins 2, Kawungan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCape HillsboroughKawungan
Median house price$825K$830K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.29%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.72%
1-year house growth-+16.1%
3-year house growth-+35.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%3.1%
Population395,460

Cape Hillsborough vs Kawungan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Cape Hillsborough and $830K in Kawungan, so Cape Hillsborough is the cheaper entry point, with Kawungan houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Kawungan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.29%, compared with 4.00% in Cape Hillsborough, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Cape Hillsborough and 3.1% in Kawungan, so landlords in Cape Hillsborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kawungan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,460 against 39, roughly 140 times the size of Cape Hillsborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kawungan for rental income, Cape Hillsborough for a lower purchase price, Cape Hillsborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison